ELF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coty has a net margin of 8.49% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of -31.23%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 15.56% beat Coty's return on equity of -9.31%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $124.82, signalling downside risk potential of -0.35%. On the other hand Coty has an analysts' consensus of $6.93 which suggests that it could grow by 46.43%. Given that Coty has higher upside potential than e.l.f. Beauty, analysts believe Coty is more attractive than e.l.f. Beauty.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.519, which suggesting that the stock is 51.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coty has a beta of 1.957, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.748%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coty pays out 14.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Coty's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $332.6M, which are smaller than Coty quarterly revenues of $1.3B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $28.3M is higher than Coty's net income of -$405.7M. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.90x while Coty's PE ratio is 38.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 5.56x versus 0.69x for Coty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dollar Tree has a net margin of 8.49% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of 7.4%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 15.56% beat Dollar Tree's return on equity of -49.43%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $124.82, signalling downside risk potential of -0.35%. On the other hand Dollar Tree has an analysts' consensus of $95.66 which suggests that it could grow by 0.49%. Given that Dollar Tree has higher upside potential than e.l.f. Beauty, analysts believe Dollar Tree is more attractive than e.l.f. Beauty.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.519, which suggesting that the stock is 51.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dollar Tree has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.146%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dollar Tree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dollar Tree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $332.6M, which are smaller than Dollar Tree quarterly revenues of $4.6B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $28.3M is lower than Dollar Tree's net income of $343.4M. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.90x while Dollar Tree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 5.56x versus 1.40x for Dollar Tree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pricesmart has a net margin of 8.49% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of 3.21%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 15.56% beat Pricesmart's return on equity of 12.65%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $124.82, signalling downside risk potential of -0.35%. On the other hand Pricesmart has an analysts' consensus of $105.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.43%. Given that Pricesmart has more downside risk than e.l.f. Beauty, analysts believe e.l.f. Beauty is more attractive than Pricesmart.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.519, which suggesting that the stock is 51.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pricesmart has a beta of 0.808, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.25%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pricesmart offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pricesmart pays out 47.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Pricesmart's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $332.6M, which are smaller than Pricesmart quarterly revenues of $1.4B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $28.3M is lower than Pricesmart's net income of $43.8M. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.90x while Pricesmart's PE ratio is 22.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 5.56x versus 0.62x for Pricesmart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Target has a net margin of 8.49% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of 4.35%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 15.56% beat Target's return on equity of 28.91%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $124.82, signalling downside risk potential of -0.35%. On the other hand Target has an analysts' consensus of $103.23 which suggests that it could grow by 8.24%. Given that Target has higher upside potential than e.l.f. Beauty, analysts believe Target is more attractive than e.l.f. Beauty.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.519, which suggesting that the stock is 51.948% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Target has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.483%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Target offers a yield of 4.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.12 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Target pays out 50.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Target's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $332.6M, which are smaller than Target quarterly revenues of $23.8B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $28.3M is lower than Target's net income of $1B. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.90x while Target's PE ratio is 10.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 5.56x versus 0.41x for Target. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.